GENERAL
NOTES:
Argument
for quote:
Society
has a way of reproducing the same piece of art (whether it be film, painting,
media) over and over, which has lost it's way, and is now only about the money.
Counter
argument: do the newer artists believe what they are doing is right? Or was it
all for money in the first place
Examples
of reproduction for money:
Movie
sequels, - movies which are sequels of older, well loved movies using the same
cast many years later, because people have no original ideas, and end up
ruining the love of the original movie
Songs
remixing,
Movies
rebooting - movies remade nowadays with pure CGI and more special effects just
to show off and make money, making money by using the name of an old movie, but
with a racially diverse cast in order to seem new, politically correct and edgy
Cinematic
universe - nowadays movie companies put far too much into cinematic universe's
with many movies because they know people will want to see every movie to
understand the story as a whole
Does
music fit into this? Do a lot of songs nowadays re use older songs for the
wrong reasons? Have artists as a whole lost their way?
Examples
of Art which represents the love of art:
Ray
Harryhausen
Indie
Animators on platforms such as YouTube/twitch
Movies
which use the same themes, and respect and pay attention to detail of the story
Notes on
essay:
Too many
sources, how does the point/my argument fit the brief?
Will my
point be lost in the mix of my sources and writers?
No comments:
Post a Comment